Explanatory Tables

Explanatory tables of the Cases

The Cases Explained more simply with key ideas –

Looking at role models and existing GOOD experiences and showing what has already been achieved with some success and

examples of what can be achieved –

Academic & Citizens Motivations and Case Achievements

In this section we have prepared tables showing what ‘Motivated the (Academic) Enablers’ to want to Enable/Empower Citizens (shown in column 3) and similarly ‘Why’ the Citizens, or their equivalent, themselves were Motivated to learn new ways and means to become enabled and ideally empowered; we’ve done this because motivating involvement in our kind of proposal is critical. Finally, there is another table for the same studies showing, for each, what we believe has been their major achievement for each case to date. These tables are themselves summarised as ‘Wordle Diagrams’ in the main proposal.

Case

Enabler’s Motivation

Citizen’s Motivation

 

Generic Process  A – UPBEAT

This Enabler, as a PVC responsible for leading Enterprise and Regional Affairs in his University, urgently needed to develop an evaluatory tool to help his academics staff, and the staff of 10 other British and European Universities, develop Citizen Enabling projects that worked well. He was therefore highly motivated to develop something that was user friendly to his academic enablers and the citizens they were trying to help. His immediate staff also recognized the need, and helped him develop, try, test and improve a tool that could help others with much effect. On a project funded to involve ten other British and European Universities, their academics were also keen to enhance the tool so it became useful to them as well from different cultures.

The European Academics, from the ten Universities involved in the UPBEAT programme, became highly motivated to help in this important evaluatory development. These Enabling Academic quickly saw how the questioning framework, this tool provided, could be used on some 150 projects they had agreed to deliver with each striving to deliver different aspects of Citizen Enablement. So they were actually demanding a tool to help them engage, enable & empower the citizens involved in these projects in order to achieve successful outcomes. These second-order Enablers found the tool also useful in working with the  citizens for whom they were collaboratively designing solutions. As a result they, and their citizen partners, were indeed highly motivated to become involved in using the evaluatory tool. 

 

Generic Process B – PUMR

This Enabler came from a working class family who had fought their way into the middle class. An academic failure in his youth, with strong educational support, he managed to go to a university in the front-line of the industrial era, where he gained a thirst for learning. In his resulting forty years as an academic he realized that Universities could be very different and PUMR was developed to provide him, and others, with an approach which would truly enable life-long-adult-learning. His motivation was to reach as many people as he could to enable and empower them, as he had himself been empowered before. The present proposal is simply an extension of that ambition.

Those using PUMR found it helpful in enabling them to reach and sensitively lead citizens in their region to undertake new ways of living, work & business. When citizens & small businesses saw what the PUMR approach had to offer, written in their language, they had no problem in being motivated to become involved. They also liked an approach which led to self-learning and ways of development, with the education handled in an enjoyable & rewarding way. Similarly, the learning Enablers, whether at a University, a University College, or independent provider wanted to use an approach that facilitated their working relationships. In Belgium, the approach was so successful, it was stage managed towards other regional colleges also with much effect.   

 

Case Study 1 – Community Banks

This Enabler, a financially acute, former Director of a major British Housing Association, was also a magistrate before he retired to undertake this project. In this latter role, he was aware that many of the people appearing before him for sentencing could not pay their fines, because they had no access to traditional banks and were being ripped off by loan sharks; there are 3 million such people in the UK. He decided to sort this out himself by becoming a Senior Fellow at Salford University to undertake the Community Banking project reported here. He had given up a great deal to do this which shows his motivation and desire to help citizens less fortunate than himself. He realized that if such ‘banks’ were to be of value to ordinary citizens they had to be developed and run by them so their banking business could be understood by their own kind.

Across the UK early studies had shown the real need for what was envisaged in this project, but not one had had the capability to work with citizens to help them, to help themselves, to become their own bankers. Further research showed that most of the poor were perfectly capable of handling the necessary banking affairs to make such facilities possible. As the Enabler began working with these citizens he was able to help them craft their own ‘community banks’ that would deliver, and then worked with the relevant government agencies and their officers to allow them to be ab le to do this. He found there was no problem in getting a team of citizens, in each environment he had explored, to undertake an appropriate development programme. Over the time of the development nearly thirty banks were developed by local citizens, all highly motivated and able to develop and run a community bank.

 
 

Case Study 2 – PUMR supported development at the University College Leuven Limburg (UCLL)

The first of these two Enablers had work closely with the PASCAL International Observatory for life-long-learning and found them extremely useful. He, and his local boss in a University College, who were joining with another college, at a time when there was much local regional industrial depression. PASCAL introduced both Enablers to PUMR and learning sessions were developed to take their fellow senior academics on a better process of solving their local problems by producing Citizen Focused Learning support for their region. The Enablers quickly understood what they needed to do this, & their staff, to help local people become Enabled/Empowered. The Enablers became so highly motivated in their developing process that they then stage managed it elsewhere. Indeed, one of them now act for the Country wide organization helping small businesses become more innovative for wealth creation.

The citizens of Leuven and Limburg, the catchment area surrounding the new combined college known as UCLL, are now extremely motivated to work with academics who speak their language and help them regenerate with ways and means that seem quite normal to them. With this in mind, for instance, a new regionally looking faculty has become the perfect place  for local citizens to come and learn how to get the best from their college academics. So new joint ventures are now regularly being developed of mutual benefit to the college and the regions citizens. UCCL has also explored other projects in the community itself, such as the development of ‘pop-up’ shops and the ZUMA centre where expectant mothers can learn about giving birth in a relaxed way. The whole emphasis on this Citizen Enablement development is the citizens and small businesses themselves and that is precisely why they are motivated to work with the college.

 
 
 

Case Study 3 – Contra-ception: The Board Game

This Enabler was a senior academic who started to devise the Contraceptive Education Board Game in the late nineties because she recognised the need for more effective methods of teaching young people about sexual health. She had become aware that her junior nurse educators and the parents of the young were unwilling or unable to do such teaching easily and capably, and a raft of government legislation had begun to suggest better methods of engagement on this controversial topic. So she became highly motivated to take on the challenge, and has spent most of her life developing valuable and well-timed educational tools to sort the situation for good. She has not only done this, but in the process has become internationally renowned for her innovations and now run a profitable business doing this.

Those in most need of her help, the young, and sometimes uneducated, have particular needs and requirements with respect to learning about sexual health. The Enabler undertook extensive research into developing a game that would be both enjoyable to the young, while helping them learn what was necessary. By testing a developing game with friends, and later student and colleagues, she improved the learning tool towards perfection. It is now used regularly across the UK, and increasingly through the world, because she has translated it into two other languages. She has also worked with people in South Africa to develop something more suitable for their culture. In short, she has produced a portfolio of developments that are so ‘fit-for-purpose’ that they are readily used by many young people who want to learn properly about contraception – motivating them to use the game is clearly no problem in  this context.

 
 
 

Case Study 4 – Peoples Voice Media

In his early career, this Enabler ran a video/audio visual department, in the International Community Development/Education Department of the Jewish Agency; he worked with community leaders across the world to develop local education and leadership programmes using audio visual media where he got his love for helping citizens give ‘voice’ to their needs. He also produced education films, ran training sessions, taught youth leadership skills & developed informal adult education programmes. As Regional Development Officer for the Citizens Advice Bureaux he helped it merge into districts which included restructures, redundancies and developing new leadership teams; he also taught staff development programmes and became regional lead on social policy and undertook a variety of evidence based work related to housing policy. It was in these roles that he gained the thirst to lead his own organisation, to become known as Peoples Voice Media, and highly motivated to develop Citizen Enablement using social media.

The citizens of Manchester willingly became involved in what Peoples Voice Media (PVM) had to offer because so many of them already wanted to learn how to master the use of social media for themselves. They particularly wanted to work with other like-minded local citizens to explore topics near to their hearts, like the natural history of the area or the intricacies of working on their  allotments to get better fruit and vegetables. Many also wanted to learn how to cope better with their own real issues and problems, to confront local city councillors and official, and to use their new ‘voices’ to put over their thoughts about how to solve particular local problems and issues. The citizens taking part in PVM had no real problem in becoming articulate in the use of social media and were soon wanting to go to a higher level of becoming their own reporters of local event; hence the follow up project mentioned later and known as the Community Reporters programme; with the BBC moving its Northern outpost to Salford’s Media City these citizen could see the opportunity of developing their growing skills into future job prospects.

 
 
 

Case Study 5 Unlimited Potential

This Enablers motivation came from several sources. His parents & grandparents came from working class backgrounds, & some experienced severe poverty & he was raised with clear values, and went on to study social anthropology (studying how people live in different social and cultural settings). He became socially and politically aware in the 1980s, a time of division and conflict. It was clear to him that the dominant system sustained and reinforced inequalities in people’s life chances. He felt a need to take action to address issues of power and privilege, by working alongside people and communities, and drawing on their strengths and expertise, in order to tackle key issues and to enable change. For all these things, this social entrepreneur has dedicated his life to helping citizens achieve their own aspirations & is highly motivated to do so.

Local people who have engaged with projects run by Unlimited Potential have had a variety of reasons for doing so. For a small number, there is a burning passion to actively create social and political change. For some, it can be a personal interest in a particular issue or neighbourhood. Others are seeking meaningful, enjoyable activities in their lives or social engagement. Some people have started by involvement in a project, moving on to volunteering, and in some cases employment with UP.  People’s engagement in Unlimited Potential reflects its clear mission and values, and a culture of valuing what people have to offer and taking a relationship-centred approach, rather than a deficit-based needs-led one. Ideally, they want people to get to a point where they say that they do not need us anymore and take greater control of their own lives. But, once again, getting citizens involved in helping themselves at UP is easy.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 6 Bouncing Higher

These Enablers recognised the undoubted need, within the UK’s North West,to develop self-learning capabilities for the region’s Small Enterprises (SMEs); these are citizens who wanted to be brought up to the leading edge of their capabilities to win work in a fast developing world and thus create their own wealth. These Enablers had also used Action Learning with much effect to help the self-learning of a range of people, including ordinary citizens and managers of SMEs. They were therefore highly motivated to develop such small group learning themselves, alongside developing supportive open learning materials. The Educational lead person at the NWDA also recognised this potential and made almost £1 million available for them to develop, test, improve and run out to market a suitable product.

The 150 small business citizens, who took part in this development programme, were very keen to do so because they had recognised how far behind their competitors they had become. As they started to use the developing materials they soon became aware of how easy it was to use this form of self-learning with the supportive materials written in the business language of their everyday use. The process of Action Learning also lent itself to the positive  sharing of ideas with like-minded SMEs from non-competitive industries. Furthermore, much of the learning materials were in digital form easy to use at home or in work. So the small business managers quickly signed up for the whole programme which they both enjoyed and learn much from. They renamed the development ‘Bouncing Higher’ because they said it enabled their own learning to bounce to the highest level that HE had to offer.

 
 
 

Case Study 7 Community Land Trusts

This main Enabler also led the Community Banking Project in Case Study 1. His time as Director of a major Housing Association showed him of the real need to produce affordable housing for the disenfranchised poor of the UK. Once he had developed the earlier ‘Banks’ towards sustainability, he turned his attention to this new, yet related, cause, with a verve. He was similarly motivated to help citizens as before, this time to achieve the requisite ownership of their own dwellings, while leaving the land common to all – in perpetuity. He explored the opportunity of such a new form of tenure with the other Enabler who undertook the background research for them. The main Enabler had the skill, patience and persistence to work with Government, and it’s agencies to turn an opportunity into a reality, and at the same time, empowering local citizen groups across the UK to design, develop, enact and then use their own affordable home; a development welcomed by successive Governments which then became part of the everyday British housing offer.

The CLT development team demonstrated how a myriad of citizens across the UK could bring land and property into community ownership so as to: provide affordable homes and keep them affordable for people living or working locally; secure land for workspace, food growing and conservation; make local land available for community benefit; encourage private resident involvement; returned the value of public investment; enable people to take action to create social cohesion and a sustainable diverse community, and; offer a secure way for people to invest in community asset ownership. The completed development shows the motivation of citizens to take part in developing CLTs and tremendous achievements of the communities themselves. Citizens across the UK have, often against huge odds, set up CLTs and built homes and other community assets for the benefit of local people, while being guaranteed to remain affordable in perpetuity. They have delivered over 200 homes and, whilst this is a small dent in overall housing need, the CLTs have made a significant contribution to the communities they serve.

 
 
 

Case Study 8 Community Reporters

This Enablers early work with People’s Voice Media prepared him to use his expertise to develop citizens who wanted to go further than simply understanding how to use the basics of social media to become ‘Community Reporters’ in their own right, with the potential to become engaged by others, perhaps securing them longer term employment. He was sufficiently motivated to create key partnerships across the UK and then in Europe, that have enabled PVM to expand its current services and offers. In the process he had demonstrated extensive experience of obtaining financial resources to achieve objectives through tendering, joint bidding, developing projects and products which have furthered the objectives of the developing organisation to train Community Reporters having the necessary skills and aptitudes.  So, local small teams of citizens throughout Europe learned how to find out about issues of interest in great detail, write stories of real interest to all, then produce audio/visual reports that are sufficiently compelling that some have been commissioned to produce copy by external agencies. His latest development is to launch the Institute of Community Reporters (ICR) bringing together citizens across Europe to raise the quality of reporting; it has become a powerful force to be considered.

This project was almost demanded, firstly by local citizens in Salford and Greater Manchester, then by others in the rest of the UK and finally from many countries across Europe. Citizens could clearly see the potential of becoming professional in the way they reported community affairs. With the growth in interest of media, many more citizens are aware of the scope of such a new reporting environment.  Local small teams of citizens throughout Europe learned how to find out about issues of interest in great detail, write stories of real interest to all, then produce audio/visual reports that were sufficiently compelling that they were commissioned to produce copy. The reporters also banded together to produce an Institute of Community Reporters to ensure the voice of these reporters were heard and they became a powerful force to be considered. In forming the Institute, itself a Europe wide increasingly professionally based body, they also realised the need to set up a network representing 4 different types of Citizen Reporter: basic Community Reporters: those who have accessed ICR approved Community Reporting training and have been badged accordingly; Trainers and Digital Curators: those who ICR has approved to deliver Community Reporting training and story curation activities; Social Licensees: those having a license agree to conduct Community Reporting activities; Partners: those delivering collaborative projects, sharing knowledge and developing new practices, methodologies and training materials.

 
 
 

Case Study 9 The Salford Innov-ation Forum

The Enabler’s motivation came from his early days in Salford where he recognised both the creative and innovative potential of Salfordians, but the lack of any support to enable them to deliver this easily. Part of this lack was because there were no physical facilities to support innovative design and development. As the leader of the University’s reach-out to the community he set about to change this by setting up the Salford Innovation Park where different organisations were encouraged to come to the area, sitting side-by-side with the University, to provide an overall environment of creative development and a building, to be known as the Salford Innovation Forum, where new developments could be initiated and developed into wealth creating success. He was highly motivated to use his entrepreneurial & leadership skills to work with other locals to deliver both the Park and the Forum; both of which became highly successful.

Local people, especially those in the Salford’s New Deal for Communities, the City’s Councillors and Offices and local businesses were all highly motivated to develop both the Park and Salford Innovation Forum, because they also recognised the potential both developments had to offer. They were therefore keen to become fully engaged in the committee set up the explore, develop, design and deliver these facilities even though they knew it would take a great deal of effort. In the end this development even became a burning passion for some local citizens who worked with a University Design Director to creatively explore different opportunities for their own innovative futures and for the design of the Innovation Forum itself. Many from the neighbourhood also became the first users of the Forum and some undertook early management tasks for the running of the SIF. The SIF soon became full of small companies, often initiated by Salfordians, who wanted to develop themselves in Salford and indeed led to the take over of its management by Manchester Science Parks.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 10 HART

The Enabler in this context had himself been a volunteer member of a large Housing Association and with other, like minded voluntary citizens, recognised the weakness in his ‘duty of care’ in controlling the management of the Housing Association. Having been to several training programmes put on by the National Association of Housing Associations, he realised they really were not ‘fit-for-purpose’ in helping him, or similar citizens across the UK, learn how to undertake their role effectively and efficiently. As someone passionate about learning himself, he determined to work out how to do a better job and secured funding to study the needs of citizens like himself and then produce educational tools to help deliver cost effective learning that would deliver suitable improvements in the volunteers skills. They were particularly pleased that a simple ‘whist’ type game was so empowering to these volunteers self-learning.

The case studies of voluntary citizen HA controllers, guided a a senior research fellow, in determining how such volunteer citizens cope with their decision making; what they perceived to be their role; how successful they were in using advice from their professional and technological ’experts’; how they evaluated their actual achievements; and how successful they had been in the use of public finance. This enable HART to identify the training/learning needs of both lay and professional groups who made major decisions for Housing Associations. As a result, they developed illustrative case studies, role playing exercises, a cartoon style guidebook, scenario based exercises & a game called ‘Teams” to effectively support these citizens’ learning. So effective were they and so motivating for the citizens to want to use these tools, that they became part of the national movements regular training.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 11 Smart City Futures

The Enabler in this context was also Chairman of the organisation linking together the four Greater Manchester Universities who collectively wanted to encourage more local residents of the city become involved with themselves in collaborative partnership. His understanding of citizen needs and aspirations made him realise that a very different kind of community focused event, where citizens could truly have their say and make their voices known, might engender a very different kind of development. He therefore involved a social media specialist who truly knew how to engage, involve and empower citizens in a conference type event could work. So his motivation for Smart City Futures came from his knowledge that such a development could make a real difference for Manchester, it’s residents, it’s universities and it’s local professionals.

The use of powerful social media, used in a Greater Manchester conference at the Lowry Centre both engaged and empowered local citizens and communities to become more involved in joint working with the four Manchester  Universities. The powerful use of mobile phone technology helped citizen form unique partnerships, with academics, for mutual benefit and together they co-created over ten new projects which enabled all to flourish in the Knowledge Economy. So the event, called ‘’Smart City Future’s’ actually enabled Salford and Manchester to focus on the empowerment of professionals & policy leaders working closely with citizens and communities for the benefit of all. It did this by empowering local citizens to take part in a new and different form of collective conversation and they willingly did so.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 12 New Deal for Commun-ities Charleston & Lower Kersal

This Enabler is a person of humanity, socially aware, a good manager and a fine leader who, by his own admission, was at the right stage in his career to take on the senior role in the CLK NDC. He was also open,, & naturally suited, to meet the sensitive leadership needs of competing influences in the Scheme. Also he had already been involved in many regeneration programmes: urban programme, European regional development fund, city challenge, all with single regeneration budget. So he started his role highly motivated to enable the new deal for communities programme to work well and thus empower local citizens to learn to properly do it for themselves. For him, ‘it was also a big step to lead the team having previously (and subsequently) serving under others, and that responsibility was also a key motivator. He often reflects that it was the most demanding phase of his career but by far the most satisfying’. It also seemed an ideal opportunity for him to bring together all the good bits of his previous roles, and the skills he had developed, and despite the limitations of the job, he believes he did the job well.

It is perhaps more tricky to understand why local citizens would want to become involved in NDC. There were clearly many motivations. A key one was that a lot of the programmes activities directly affected people’s lives, especially better housing, but many other issues as well. It was also badged as the ‘community being in charge’, and ‘in charge’ of what appeared to be a huge pot of money (£53m). This issue probably & eventually led to frustration for some citizens when it was realised that being in charge also meant being accountable, along with the fact that whilst it was a large pot of money, it was a drop in the ocean in terms of overall public investment in the area. It could be argued that that frustration led some to become motivated to challenge the programme and seek change things in other ways. The citizens also had a fine community leader/enabler in her own right having played a community leader role at a local nursery and developed political awareness while volunteering for CREST, a community based employment and training project. And like all the other local residents the redevelopment proposals were very real, would impact on her life and that of the rest of the community whom she clearly loved.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 13 ICCARUS

At the start of this development, the Enabler led a socio-technical research team whose daily role was teaching architectural students; those not normally the most academic of individuals. His team had learned how to support their learning processes in the consideration of complex topics and, using these skills, had just completed a simulation showing ordinary people how to ‘exit buildings when they were on fire’. This came to the notice of the West Midland Fire Brigade who wanted to work with the team to develop a simulator for teaching fire officers how to ‘command and control major fire event’. The Enabler was keen to undertake a collaboration with them so he could keep his team together and show his architectural staff ,his team’s alternative design flair – a strong motivation.

Those primarily involved in this project were fire services officers, ordinary citizens mainly chosen because of their action based skills in the fighting of fires, often bright, but academically unqualified. As the officers proceed up the ranks they have to learn how to manage, command and therefore control increasingly larger fire events. Traditional this was done by rote learning, but the command and control guidance books are vast and difficult to properly understand. The command and control simulator developed by this academic team, with much fire officer support, helped them understand the necessary theory and management practice in a way to suite their existing needs and wants. ‘Mock-ups’ of the developing simulator, led to test-improvement cycles in use by normal fire officers; it was then honed it until it showed real potential. It was so good fire officers wanting promotion readily used the developed simulator, often in  a self-learning mode, to bring their understanding up to the highest level – the simulator was itself self-motivating as an educational tool.

 
 
 

Case Study 14 The Old Abbey Taphouse

The Enablers were both musicians where putting on events was a struggle for years because of overprices venues and spaces that were prescriptive in terms of what they would allow them to do, e.g. live music they would say is downstairs in a room separated from the rest of a pub and the only people who could come and see it were specifically for that event. They were looking for their own space where they could provide something more immersive, where people come down for the experience, and to meet people, but not particularly to see a particular act or community group or activist organization. So they decided to develop and run their own in the ‘Taphouse’. In short they now provide Citizen Enablement through spaces and places, and love to help this happen through the pub. And, as a former academic, one Enabler got to disseminate his research and provide opportunities for learning, politics and entertainment that connects a large institution like Manchester University with the communities and businesses that surround it.

The Enablers think Citizens come to the ‘Taphouse’ because they are providing a space/spaces at no charge (if you are local you can do donations at the door); they are also open to experiment with all genres, lectures and ideas, as long as they are open they ensure everyone has something to enjoy. This is a difficult opportunity to find elsewhere, these days. In a sense ‘Taphouse’ is a reflection of the communities that surround it – although the Enablers started out as promoters and musicians, they have increasingly found that their role is to facilitate other people who are putting on events or providing services, or engaging in citizen science, or disseminating their research to a wider audience. This is what encourages citizens to want to participate in its events. And in the pandemics lock-down ‘Taphouse’ has also developed other facilities much needed, and wanted, by the local communities; its take-home service and ‘TVdinners’ has proved very welcome by the local people as they provide food which other services seem unwilling, or unable, to provide; this caring provision is yet another reason why local people are endeared to making use of the pub.

 
 
 
 

Case Study 15  Human- Centered Research Distinction

These Enablers are motivated by a desire to use human-centred design research to address wicked problems and deliver impactful research. Through the support of the School of Arts & Media, they are able to focus on problems that are challenging, interesting and worth tackling.

Through the research projects and networks, the Enablers have established relationships with individuals and organisations interested in making a difference. They frequently work with action-oriented practitioners committed to problem-solving who recognise the value of a human-centred design approach

 
 

Case Study 16  Academic Enterprise Leader-ship

The Enablers in this case were simply writing up the theoretical basis for the work portrayed in the present text in a form suitable to convince fellow academics of the value and importance of the sort of Academic Enterprise for Citizens Enablement mentioned here.

The Leadership Foundation for Higher Education deliberately commissioned the Enablers to write up this theoretical basis of developing Academic Enterprise as a spur for others in Universities to take on an alternative Citizen Enablement role in the Enterprise Leadership and other educational support they offered.

 
 

Vocabulary used to describe motivations

Rank ordered by frequency of mention (>5)

 

Enablers

Citizens

develop (39)

citizens (46)

enabler (38)

development (33)

citizen (25)

community (27)

motivated (18)

local (24)

work (16)

enabler (19)

help (15)

learning (18)

people (15)

people (17)

learning (14)

working (16)

community (13)

small/business (15)

university (12)

help (112)

lead(ership) (11)

project (12)

academic (11)

motivated (12)

local (11)

involved (11)

education (10)

wanted (9)

social (9)

wanted (9)

staff (9)

academic (8)

team (8)

deliver (7)

housing (8)

business (7)

empower (7)

Offer (7)

different (7)

engaged (7)

regional (7)

officers (7)

programmes (7)

programme (7)

skills (7)

social (7)

role (7)

provide (7)

support (7)

tool (7)

association (6)

fire (6)

banks (6)

college (6)

innovative (6)

management (6)

media (6)

issues (6)

needs (6)

problem (6)

produce (6)

media (6)

project (6)

University (6)

reporters (6)

real (6)

staff (6)

training (6)

UK (6)

used (6)

 

UK(6)

Case

What’s been Achieved

 

Generic Process A UPBEAT

§  This structured evaluation, open learning and coaching framework was successfully developed to drive traditional academics to become more enterprising, especially in their reaching out to citizens, communities and small business enterprises; UPBEAT, or the University Partnership for Benchmarking Enterprise and Associated Technologies, proved successful in the evaluation of over 200 exemplary British and European Reach-out projects. As a result, the Enabler has honed, simplified and extended the process where necessary to produce open educational material to help even more academics,, across the globe, improve: their relationships, outcomes, outputs and impact with external partners to the university working in collaboration on projects for mutual benefit; the successful implementation of Knowledge Transfer Partnerships using a structured approach to collaborative project development, co-identification of worthy problems and the co-design of successful solutions through improved and creative team-working; and the understanding of the ’motivation’ of traditional academics to become involved in higher academic enterprise and improve their enterprising abilities. In a follow up development  a portfolio of specific evaluation and implementation techniques was also produced to support postgraduate and industry based ‘knowledge transfer programmes’ for the Government of the Czech Republic.

 

Generic Process B PUMR

The PASCAL PUMR development has been open for use by Higher Education Institutions for several years and two colleges have so far explored the use of the approach which helped them engage more appropriately with citizens, communities, businesses, industry, civic society, voluntary services and public authorities. Those who have made use of PUMR see that it enables them to harness local, regional and global talents through deep collaborations to identify worthy problems and create innovative and cost effective solutions. With external partners from business, industry, civil and voluntary services and the community, they can now co-produce successful systemic deliverables enabling real improvement for lasting impact. The most powerful use of PUMR, with its UPBEAT evaluator tool, has been by UCLL, and is reported fully in Case Study 4. The UCLL Enablers soon recognised the approach actually enabled them to:
embed a more appropriate culture and commitment of their institution to policies of engagement within their region
explore a range of new domains and categories of engagement, with the resulting improved quality and depth such engagements can bring, and
demonstrate to themselves the skills available for the co-identification of worthy issues in and with regional stakeholders and for the co-creation of better solutions with external partners.
Many items in PUMR’s schedule were selected by drawing on significant part of exemplary assessment instruments including some widely used in the US, and elsewhere, for benchmarking university/community engagement, for example the Carnegie Foundation, the External Institutional Assessment Tool of the US Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities; this has resulted in an improved UPBEAT framework (www.upbeat.eu) and the HEFCE benchmarking tool used in the UK. This PUMR tools do not pretend to capture every possible issue or topic related to an institution’s role in regional economic development, but it has been shown to improve regional innovation which enhances and create economic prosperity, environmental sustainability and social cohesion depends on many regional and institutional factors including the capabilities of the educational institution, the way its supports its staff and the facilities it provides. It is not intended that the instrument is onerous to complete. It is also expected that someone well placed in the central administration of the institution, but with a good understanding of the university’s reach-out to business or the community, should have a sufficient basis to complete the schedule, maybe supported by some consultation across the institution depending on the way the institution is structured.  Those using PUMR so far are extremely impressed by the breadth and depth of its offer and it’s step-by-step guidance towards success. Furthermore, the citizens and SMEs using the approach say it gives them high confidence to develop better ways of working. The only real issue PUMR has is a lack of take up by Universities who think they are already capable of reaching out well to citizens; however, in reality, they really do need to learn better ways of helping their regions citizens learn differently. This issue is discussed in much depth in the main paper relating to this presentation.

 

Case Study 1 – Community Banks

Community Finance Solution has helped local citizens throughout the UK set up nearly thirty “Community Banks”, now mainly bearing the name ‘Moneyline’ (https://moneyline-uk.com/  for more details), which were developed by citizens, and for them, to make funds available for them at affordable rates. Eight Moneylines are active in the North West, a further 14 in Wales and they have lent between them over £10 million. They are now a leading fair finance provider that prioritises the financial needs, health and wellbeing of the lowest income households in the UK over profit and exist to serve the lowest income households by providing affordable, low value loans and small sum savings accounts; last year they were ‘Responsible Lender of the year’. Their loan process is extremely simple, friendly and personal. It is designed to agree a loan that works for the customer and is flexible and has no hidden costs. The Moneylines deliver loans through a branch network with support from a growing, telephone service team. They were founded in the belief that credit, provided responsibly and not creating further hardship is a vital tool in helping people spread the cost of something they need and that access to affordable financial products that fit with your life should not be a privilege. Looking in a little more depth, for instance, the Portsmouth Area Regeneration Trust (PART), one of the early versions was particularly set up to provide affordable loans to people on low incomes and to small businesses, and was officially opened on the 7th July 2000 by Stephen Timms Financial Secretary to HM Treasury. Within 12 months, this not-for-profit organisation aimed to be making at least 1,000 affordable loans a year and employing the equivalent of 2.5 full-time staff. By 2006, PART hopes to achieve a loan book of £4 million and employ 4 or 5 full-time staff. PART charges the same rates of interest as high street banks. It offered an alternative to expensive legal and illegal money-lenders. In Portsmouth alone, it was estimated that 7,000 households were paying 80 per cent interest on loans from money-lenders. The activities of loan-sharks, who charged as much as 60,000 per cent interest (with menaces) on their loans are more difficult to plot, but these organisations flourished in Portsmouth and all areas of social and financial exclusion. What PART and other ‘Community Banks’ offered were: loans to meet domestic emergencies, e.g. to buy a refrigerator or children’s shoes; financial advice; and a cheque-cashing service, as an alternative to cheque-cashing agencies who charge their customers without bank accounts as much as 10 or 15 per cent of the value of the cheques they handle. For all these developments Community Finance Solutions received the Times Higher Award for ‘Outstanding Contribution to the Local Community’ in 2005, after receiving the ‘North West Innovative Excellence Award’ in 2002.

 
 
 

Case Study 2 – PUMR supported development at the University College Leuven Limburg (UCLL)

The cooperation between the UCLL and the PUMR teams were enjoyable and extremely strong, both gaining much insight and knowledge about leadership from each other and this also added value of other universities of applied sciences in the region.  A huge number of individual examples of successful collaborations are listed in the case study itself & even more examples are developing day by day.  Not only the number of cases was important, but the collaboration gave the UCLL leadership enablers much joy as their work & had a significant impact on the well-being and prosperity of local society. The PUMR/UPBEAT process, mentioned before and adopted by the UCLL team, became part of the identity of the new merged institution. UCLL, as a result was seen as one of the forerunners in Flanders of advanced ways of higher learning and their ways were taken on by other institutions as a result. It therefore became part of regional embedding and overall cooperation. UCLL’s experiences with PUMR made them ready to co-define all future problems and opportunities & they co-established cooperation platforms to build a new future for their region and province.This overall development showed the major achievements of the UCLL team and the citizens/SMEs with whom they worked; their ways of working also showed the best principles of ‘positive deviance’ in changing the way a whole college positively learnt to help its regions.

 
 

Case Study 3 –Contraception: The Board Game

The Game was originally the brainchild of Barbara Hastings-Asatourian (our Enabler), Director of Community and Learning Disabilities Nursing Studies at Salford University. Designed in line with Government guidance on sex and relationship education, and based on a wealth of teaching experience and health care research, the game can be played by up to six people who move contraceptive-shaped counters around a board. Depending on the square they land on, players pick a card which can spark discussion on anything from the mechanics of sex to dealing with emotional blackmail and other difficult situations. The game includes a condom demonstrator to give players direct experience of using contraception. Barbara received practical advice and mentoring from the University’s Business Enterprise Support Team (BEST), who helped her to launch the game through the spin-out company Contraception Education in 2001. BEST provided office space in the University’s thriving incubation unit and helped the company form a partnership with Moorlands Plastics, a socially responsible firm producing high quality plastic components. Since its launch the game has gone from strength to strength, and to date over 2,000 games have been snapped up by schools, youth clubs and health centres in the UK and overseas. In recognition of this success the company was nominated for a Salford City Council Export Award in 2002 and, more recently, Barbara was put forward for the prestigious British Female Inventor of the Year prize. Contraception: the Board Game is based on practical experience and solid health and social care research. The need for effective sex education is as stark as ever. The UK has the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Western Europe and, whilst teenage pregnancy rates fell during the 1970s in most of Western Europe, they have remained relatively constant in the UK. Research makes it clear that countries with low or falling rates of teenage parenthood are more likely to have adequate sex education, including assertiveness training and communication about contraception. By thinking inventively about the real need for exciting and engaging teaching material, Barbara Hastings-Asatourian has made a major contribution to reducing unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections among young people. Some of her great achievements include: Entrepreneur of the Year finalist 2003; British Female Inventor of the Year Finalist 2003; an Award for Combating teenage pregnancy and STIs. The game has also led to a separate enterprise where a computer learning tool can be used by whole classrooms to teach all aspects of sexual health care.

 

Case Study 4 – Peoples Voice Media

People’s Voice Media has clearly provided services that enable voices to be heard in order to influence change and inform practices, processes and policies. In particular they have ensured that citizens can, and do, tell authentic stories about the experiences that matter to them, offering valuable insight into their lives and can help creative positive social change. PVM has therefore delivered: a research methodology – engaging citizens in research processes and enable them to participate and set their own research agendas; a co-creation practice – supporting co-creation processes to enable voices to be heard and help people learn from one another; an insight tool –  providing rich insight into people’s lives that give a better understanding of people’s worlds and the way they live; an evaluation approach – supporting people to articulate their views and perspectives, and reflect on specific experiences; a dialogue creator – using stories as stimuli for discussions, enabling various perspectives to be represented and part of a conversation; a community/ organisation development apparatus – helping to develop services and neighbourhoods from the ground up; a professional practice – training people to use our methodologies within their work, across a range of sectors; a digital inclusion and skills development training programme – embedding digital literacies and transferable skills into all of our workshops and programmes. PVM is clearly a great success, engages citizens through Greater Manchester and increasingly in other areas of the UK and Europe.  It’s Enabler was awarded the Leonardo European Corporate Learning Award 2013 “Crossing Borders”, having been recognised for all his work as Chief Executive of People’s Voice Media (PVM) – this not-for-profit community development organisation based in Salford. He was awarded notably for taking citizens learning to new heights in the work he initiated and pioneered”.

 

Case Study 5 – Unlimited Potential

Some of the things of which Unlimited Potential are most proud of creating together with local people, and their greatest achievements to date, include:
o    Healthy Communities Collaborative – increasing the rate of early-stage diagnosis of cancer and heart disease in low-income communities
o    health coaching – setting up one of the first health trainer services, which was then complemented by well-being coaching
o    Smoke-Free Spaces – reducing and quitting smoking by focussing on who people love and care
o    It’s A Goal! – using football as a metaphor to help long-term unemployed men to improve their mental health and well-being
o    Realising the Value – partner site for co-production as part of this national programme on person and community-centred approach, led by Nesta and the Health Foundation for NHS England
o    Dadly Does It – supporting dads to spread positive fatherhood in low-income communities
o    Elephants Trail – co-producing new solutions with people with lived experience of severe and multiple disadvantage
o    Fuelling Ambitions Creatively Together (FACT) – exposing young people to meaningful experiences of local industry/business, outside the ‘norm’ of school and home life, and exposing industry/business to future local talent and their new ideas.
o    social value – developing our organisational social value through the use of social accounting and audit, and being a core member of the Salford Social Value Alliance and its 10% Better campaign.
o    Living Wage – leading on spreading the real Living Wage in Salford, leading to it becoming the first place in England to get formal recognition for its ambition to become a Living Wage City.

 

Case Study 6 Bouncing Higher

Bouncing Higher’ became a highly successful balanced learning approach by six North West Universities in the UK. It was a combination of action learning, open learning and coaching – which helped 150 small to medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in the North of England increase their Gross Value Added profitability through innovation by some 24.5%. Originating under the name ‘NetworkNorthWest’ it was developed to address the issues relating to poor take up of traditional business support by SMEs. Because of the generally low levels of engagement of the business community with Institutes of Higher Education (HEIs), a learning programme was developed specifically to improve innovation, entrepreneurship, enterprise and wealth creation in the regional SME business community through educational micro-networking – networking to learn from, and with, others in a similar position in other SMEs. In particular, it mainly used ‘Action Learning’ techniques which allowed the SME participants to set their own agenda for what they felt they needed to learn and was most welcomed by the SMEs. The programme benefited by working with six delivery partner universities across the North West of England. Their support was multi-disciplinary and multifaceted (including applied research, knowledge transfer, management and professional development and provision of sector specific training for employees) and there was potential to deliver support in the form of face-to-face contact right across the region on a local basis, or with on-line resources. The project, seen as exemplary by the NWDA, has since delivered support for Manchester Chamber Business Enterprises to further cohorts of SMEs across Greater Manchester and beyond. And since the completion of the pilot development, the core process has been adopted as the basis for a second level of intervention for leadership development by the Northern Leadership Academy. During the course of the initial project, 118 SMEs had been prepared to invest more than 30 hours contact time to the project, while the remainder had between three and 30 hours; this is a considerable commitment from business people who are frequently unwilling to give up even the moist minimal time for training and education. All participants grew in confidence and every participant had a different but rewarding learning outcome. For SMEs to spend such amounts of time engaged in mid-career professional learning is a key finding in its own right, since many traditional courses fail to get anywhere near this level of engagement.

 
 
 

Case Study 7 Community Land Trusts

Affordable and sustainable housing development was created, based upon collaborative research within the Salford Construction Research and Innovation Initiative and the Enablers pioneering R&D with Salford University’s Community Finance Solutions on ‘Community Land Trusts’. As a result of this research and development there has been consistent growth in CLTs and there are now over 80 organisations in England and Wales that define themselves as a CLTs, ranging from fledgling organisations that are just starting out to established CLTs. The National CLT Network was formed in 2010 as the National body for CLTs that promotes and supports the work of CLTs and its members.  At the last time a detailed study was undertaken, 137 homes had been completed and a further 92 homes were on site. Of the total of 229 homes provided by 18 CLTs, 35% (81 homes) were for rent, 59% (135 homes) for part sale and 6% (13 homes) for outright sale. Self-build homes or plots accounted for 34 homes or 15% of the total. Also of significance is the fact that just under half of the were being provided in Cornwall. This demonstrates the impact of the Cornwall CLT acting as an umbrella support body that can provide technical advice and support to local CLTs as well as developing homes in its own right. Cornwall CLT is co-located with Cornwall Rural Housing Association who on adjoining sites have completed a further 24 homes for social rent. CFS have led the way for communities to set up CLTs and the National CLT Network looks forward to taking on the baton and creating a route for communities that becomes well-trodden. We look forward to many more communities benefitting from not only being part of the vision for their local area but the key part of the solution.  In 1999 for their overall work in this construction related area the University received the Queen’s Award for Higher and Further Education

 
 
 

Case Study 8 Community Reporters

§  Community Reporters has become a particular and sustained storytelling movement within People’s Voice Media, and also now in several other regions of the UK and in Europe. Its Reporters now professionally capable at different level, clearly use digital tools such as portable and pocket technologies & more advanced media systems to support people to tell their own stories, in their own ways. They are also capable of using the Internet to share these stories with others and can connect themselves with the people, groups and organisations who are in a position to make positive social change. Central to the development of ‘Community Reporting’, in a programme known as ‘Reuters in the Community’, is the belief that people telling authentic stories about their own lived experience offers a valuable understanding of their lives. Through creating spaces in which people can describe their own realities, Community Reporting provides opportunities in which people can use storytelling to: find their voice; challenge perceptions; be catalysts of change. In this respect they have already achieved positive change for communities by bringing peoples’ portrayals of lived experiences together to influence change from the ground up via Community Reporting methodologies. Community Reporting has three distinct components – story gathering, story curation and story mobilisation – based around the Cynefin decision-making framework for complex environments (David Snowden, 1999), as depicted in the diagram below. Through gathering, curating and mobilising stories from their growing network of Community Reporters, they seek to inform policy, processes and practice. Now local small teams of citizens throughout Europe have learned how to find out about issues of interest in great detail, write stories of real interest to all, then produce audio/visual reports that were sufficiently compelling that some were commissioned to produce copy by external agencies. The reporters have also banded together to produce an Institute of Community Reporters to ensure the voice of these reporters are heard and they have become a powerful force to be considered. The Institute of Community Reporters (the ICR) was founded by People’s Voice Media in 2012 and is the overarching entity that supports the Community Reporter movement. The movement currently spans mainly across the UK and Europe. The ICR’s functions includes: acknowledging the achievements of our members via a badging system (i.e. bronze, silver, gold, platinum depending on scope of your Community Reporter activities and training activities accessed); quality assuring Community Reporting practices (i.e. overseeing our Responsible Storytelling methodology and continually developing relevant training materials); and engaging with the network via communications, events and Community Reporting activities (e.g. social media, emailers, annual conferences, network training sessions). There are now over 1000 Community Reporters on the database from across the UK and a further 600 across Europe so it seems to make sense to develop the network and recognise the achievement  of the Community Reporters

 

Case Study 9 The Salford Innovation Forum

Salford Innovation Forum, within Salford Innovation Park, now predominantly provides a series of office suites, from 100 sq ft to 7,000 sq ft, with options from an all-inclusive package; inclusive of rent, service charge, building insurance, utilities and connectivity; to ‘create your own’, more flexible deals. Suites in Salford Innovation Forum benefit from lift and disabled access, fantastic reception facilities, communal kitchen and break-out areas as well as the on-site cafe and meeting/conference spaces. There is also a ‘hotdesk’ package which is perfect for freelancers, start-ups or small businesses who want a flexible deal with fixed prices and the option to grow with only one month’s notice. From needing a business address with the benefits of a call answering service and building facilities to a permanent base with ultra-fast internet connection and phone line, Salford Innovation Forum’s ‘hotdesk’ packages are flexibly meeting the needs of citizens so they can concentrate on the business and keep things simple. Salford Innovation Park customers also benefit from being part of an innovative community with a wide range of free business support services. SIF’s managers organise and host a number of networking activities and monthly seminars/masterclasses to provide opportunities for customers to get to know each other, share knowledge and learn from experts in different fields. Those using the SIF also have access to marketing & PR advice as well as funding support & guidance & it has strong links to Salford City Council and the University of Salford, giving businesses that locate there access to the University’s facilities and academic expertise, not to mention their incredible graduate pool.  The SIF is also home to a number of conference and meeting room facilities located are available for customers to hire from one hour to full days. Room configurations go from small meeting rooms seating 8 people to a large conference space which seats up to 75 delegates. With a dedicated events team on site, they can be sure to receive the best service so that they can focus on the more important things and leave the logistics to SIF. The SIF is much used by all citizens in Salford and beyond and has formed the basis of much Innovation, by them.

 
 
 
 
 

Case Study 10 HART

The Housing Association Research Team, funded by a grant from the joint panel of the SERC and SSRC developed a portfolio of educational tools that truly helped engage, enable and empower the voluntary citizens who control Britain’s Housing Associations. The sensitive research undertaken of the skills, abilities, needs and wants of these learners ensured that learning tools could be developed that was ‘fit-for-purpose’ in developing a number of skills, including better team working, and truly improved the decision-making in HAs. The two major games develop, known as ‘Hassle’ and ‘Teams’ were fully developed into marketable educational aids, professionally published and sold widely across the UK. They not only made a profit for the publishing houses who had taken on the task of developing such learning aids, but were also adopted by the National Federation of Housing Association as some of their key tools in helping spread better practices to citizens who previously had only limited support.

 
 

Case Study 11 Smart City Futures

SCF is an academic coalition between the Universities of Salford, Manchester and Manchester Metropolitan to work in partnership with civic leaders, professionals and citizens in the Greater Manchester Region and beyond to forge stronger relationships between academics, businesses and the community. This is an innovative drive to identify issues, share knowledge, and produce solutions to keep this thriving city-region at the forefront of policy, strategy development and decision making within the UK and as a model for regions throughout the World. Over ten new community led and focused projects emerged from this SCF event which sought to engage and  empower local people to give ‘voice’ their desires, needs and wants. It also helped the four Greater Manchester Universities engage with their local citizens and communities in projects that undoubtedly led to major City regenerations. SCF also gave the local citizens the confidence to want to try something new for their own value, that of the community, that of their universities and that of the City itself.

 

Case Study 12 New Deal for Communities for Charleston & Lower Kersal

Between 2001 and 2011, the Charlestown and Lower Kersal New Deal for Communities (NDC) partnership worked alongside the Council, partner agencies and the local community, to bring about the comprehensive regeneration of the area. During this period the area benefited from a number of landmark projects. These include the building of Salford Sports Village, the Beacon Centre, the Salford Innovation Forum and two Healthy Living Centres (Willow Tree and Energise). In addition to these important facilities, improvements were carried out on two community centres – St Sebastian’s and Lower Kersal centres and around 2,200 terraced and council owned homes. Miller Homes and ID4Living also commenced the development of more than 200 new homes on the Unity Quarter site. Since 2011, the council has continued to work with partners such as Inspiring Communities Together (ICT) and Salix Homes to transform Charlestown and Lower Kersal. In 2014, the council completed substantial environmental improvements to more than 100 homes on the Whit Lane estate. This complemented the Decent Homes work carried out by Salix Homes the previous year. In January 2015, the council selected Keepmoat as its preferred developer partner for the Charlestown Riverside development site. Following a series of community consultation events in May 2015, Keepmoat submitted a planning application for up to 450 new homes (20% of which will be affordable homes), a brand new park and an improved riverside walkway along the Irwell. This development not only creates new 2-4 bedroom homes, it also provides local people with opportunities to access apprenticeship and employment opportunities in construction. Finally, next to the Charlestown Riverside site, Low Wood hydro developers is installing a new hydro scheme and fish pass at Charlestown Weir. At the centre of the hydro system are two Archimedes Screws that will generate enough electricity to power 200 homes. It will also save more than 600 tonnes of carbon annually. So local residents and their partners have generated real improvements for their local community and have given the communities real pride back into where they work, live and play.

 
 

Case Study 13 ICCARUS

The ICCARUS project was, in effect, commissioned by the West Midlands’ Fire Services, whose Chief Fire Officer was concerned at the lack of learning support for his senior officers – those preparing themselves to take on the ‘Command and Control’ of large fire events. He dedicated his time, and those of his staff, to help the development of the ICCARUS simulator which tackled his officers needs in a unique and cost-effective way. This Chief Officer became the Head of the Fire Services College at Morton in Marsh and was able to put the developing package through many cycles of design-test-redesign based on typical staff using the developing learning tool. In this way it became a high quality learning support tool, readily used by officer wanting to learn new necessary management skills; such was the quality of the development that on some evenings at the colleges officer could be seen using the simulator in their own time. Such also was the professionalism of the tools that it was marketed by the Fire Services College who made over £250,000 in its first year of operation. The development also won major British and European Awards for the quality and innovation of this educational simulator and led to the Police Training HQ at Hendon to themselves work with the Enabling team to develop parallel simulators for use in; football crown control; siege control; and the police management of the Nottinghill Festival.

 
 
 

Case Study 14 The Old Abbey Taphouse

In recent years Manchester City Council has experienced savage budget cuts; this has heightened the need for economically-sustainable, community-minded organisations to provide public spaces that communities can use. As a STEAM-focused community hub, The Old Abbey Taphouse addresses this need through provision of overlapping spaces that are shared by both community and private stakeholders. The opportunities afforded by the overlaps between the spaces – and the interaction between business, academic and community stakeholders – produces exciting and unexpected opportunities. In particular, the Taphouse has turned a building, which was previously derelict for a significant period of time, into a vibrant community venue bridging the business and creative communities, whilst offering a place where start-up ventures and local social action projects have the space to flourish. The social value the facility is divided into three broad categories: investment in the local economy, opening a public / private community space and services to the community. In their first two years of trading at the Taphouse business grew rapidly, with £149,000 turnover in year one, and now stands at £182,000 in its second year; it employs ten local people and its directors have re-invested all their profits back into the business. Its spaces, which are free to use for the community, and available at a small fee for private stakeholders, are: an affordable cafe/restaurant serving science park residents, the universities, wider local businesses and customers from further afield who see this as a destination venue; a catering business servicing events across the public, private and voluntary/community sector both on and off site; event spaces for arts and cultural activities including popular, diverse live music events; a recording studio; a microbrewery; a health and wellbeing space; a meeting room, available at no charge to community groups; a STEM science lab in partnership with FarmLab. In just over a year Taphouse have achieved long term sustainability and provide many assets to the community.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Case Study 15 Human-Centred Design Research Distinction

The Solution Centre is now exploring further opportunities to build  networks and partnerships with organisations committed to bottom-up, human-centred approaches to tackling ‘wicked’ societal challenges and has accumulated awards for its design research and impact, including: The 2010 Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) Secured by Design  Innovation Prize —for pioneering work with GMP to develop Design for Security; The 2011 Manchester Beacons for Public Engagement Recognition Award—for work with charity Catch22 on Youth Design Against Crime; Security and Fire Excellence Award in 2019 for Contribution to Standards in the Security Sector — for ProtectED;The 2020 OSPA (Outstanding Security Performance  Award) for Outstanding Customer Service Initiative  — for ProtectEDFinalist in the 2020 PIEoneer Awards, celebrating “innovation and achievement in international student education” — for ProtectED.

 
 
 

Case Study 16 Academic Enterprise Leadership

This was a global study of the leadership, governance and management of senior academic entrepreneurs in their development of higher academic enterprise, or what others refer to as University Reach-out or the ‘third mission’; it was based on a funded HEFCE and CIHE study of 16 exemplary British leaders and also explored successful academic leaders from other cultures, including in Canada, USA, Australia, Hungary, Holland, Japan, Turkey and Norway. So, in 2010,  a report, based on interviews with over 60 academic entrepreneurial leaders, was commissioned by the British Leadership Foundation in Higher Education to portray its findings to the senior staff attending their training and educational development programmes. It was received very well by those using its findings on the Foundation’s courses and led to a small fellowship grant of £650 from the Foundation for Canadian Studies in the United Kingdom, as part of their Canada/UK University Partnerships Program (CUUPP). This permitted the Enabler to undertake further collaborative research with both the University of Victoria and the University of British Columbia. This, in turn led to the development of case studies of best practices, especially around the leadership, governance and management of university Reach-out to business and the community. In 2010, as a result of all the leadership studies mentioned in this paper, and especially his work leading to the Academic Enterprise Leadership report, the Enabler received the Leadership Award from the Times Higher Education Awards panel.

 
 
 
under construction, construction site, build

Still Under Construction

This approach is work under production and not
available at the moment:

Please use the Paper Version for the time being.
Thank you.